Bank and investor exodus worsened oil rout, traders say
Role of financial participants in price plunge adds new twist to old debate

The collapse of the oil market in late 2014 and early 2015 has had many predictable consequences: cheaper prices at the pump; pain for oil-exporting countries such as Iran, Russia and Venezuela; and a growing bonanza of deal-making as private equity firms snap up distressed oil producers.
But perhaps one surprising effect has been a revival of the long-standing debate over the impact of speculation in commodity derivatives. As in 2008, when skyrocketing prices caused widespread public criticism
More on Oil & refined products
Energy Risk at 30: Learning from the past
Energy Risk looks back at the seminal events and developments that have shaped today’s energy markets
Why Iran tensions failed to rattle markets
Despite initial fears, traders say risks were signposted and investors had deleveraged after April
Oil and products house of the year: Macquarie Group
Energy Risk Awards: Bank pioneers innovative deals in illiquid markets, taking on esoteric risk
Podcast: should negative oil prices be allowed?
Did negative oil prices signify the market was operating effectively, or that something was wrong?
Podcast: the future of retail investment in oil
Will negative prices and big losses curb retail investors’ appetite for oil futures over the longer term?
Podcast: Kaminski and Ronn on negative oil and options pricing
The market is gravitating to the Bachelier model as an alternative to Black 76
Negative oil prices put spotlight on investors
What part did Bank of China and other investors play in last month’s oil rout, asks derivatives veteran
How Onyx came from nowhere to conquer oil swaps
In just four years, market-maker has become the largest provider of liquidity in energy derivatives