Energy firms fear liquidity void if US capital proposals hit banks
Trades ‘wouldn’t be anywhere near making sense’ for banks
Energy firms are concerned about proposals from the US Federal Reserve Board that would require banks to hold extra capital for dealing in physical commodities, while experts warn that the rules could reduce physical commodity trading activity in the market by 20%.
"The negative consideration is that this could impact liquidity in physical commodities. And it raises questions about how much will be taken on board by other global regulators," says a regulatory manager at a European utility with
More on Risk management
Energy supply chain challenges prompt risk management rethink
As supply chain challenges grow, energy risk managers are taking a more dynamic and holistic approach to managing and anticipating supply chain risk, say Sapna Amlani and Stephen Golliker at Moody’s
Energy Risk Europe Leaders’ Network: the challenge of unpredictability
The European Leaders’ Network, sponsored by Engie, convened in London on June 29, 2026, and focused on the impact of geopolitical tension, price volatility and policy uncertainty on European energy markets.
Break down silos to manage geopolitics – risk managers
Risk Live: Experts says scenario planning helps identify who has information needed in a crisis
Treat AI models as would-be hackers, says quant
Risk Live: Models capable of “strategic deception” require different risk management, says former Risk.net quant of the year
AI autonomy may redefine risk management roles
Risk Live: Machine validation of autonomous processes may emerge “relatively soon”, EIF risk chief says
Managing extreme volatility in commodities
Persistent volatility requires a rethink of technology architecture, says Murex head of market risk practice
Commodity volatility prompts a rethink of risk frameworks
Commodity market volatility is exposing the cracks in firms’ risk management frameworks and policies
Asian banks close out energy clients as Iran war bites
Firms with short jet fuel positions faced losses up to $100 million as initial margin soared 566%
