How energy players are reaching the limits of hedging
Commodities firms face lasting changes in 2018
The energy hedging market is in constant flux: end-users and producers enter and leave depending on their financial limits, estimates of future market conditions and management beliefs and strategies; banks and speculative financial players swarm or recoil as price curves change shape. However, in 2018, a couple of developments in the energy business promise to produce more lasting changes.
Smart meters are finally becoming commonplace in major electricity markets. A majority of households in the US already have them, while the UK has targeted 2020 for virtually complete household coverage. Other major economies around the world have similar plans. And while it has taken US utilities a while to work out exactly what to do with the torrent of user data these meters provide, time-of-use rates are now poised to roll out in some of the largest markets in the US. The result could be less volatility, lower margins and a significant drop in the demand for power hedging.
Time-of-use rates are now poised to roll out in some of the largest markets in the US. The result could be less volatility, lower margins and a significant drop in the demand for power hedging
Much of this rests on assumptions about the degree to which consumers will alter their behaviour in response to the introduction of TOU rates – something that remains unclear, especially for the retail market. Introducing smart appliances could help here, but that assumes smart meters will operate on a single open standard that appliances could effortlessly and seamlessly use as an interface – which looks like an optimistic belief, to say the least. Hopes of behavioural change might be better founded in the commercial and industrial sectors.
Hedging is also dwindling at the long end of the oil market – in part because of backwardation, but also because of fundamental changes in the hedging market. Bank withdrawals from the commodity hedging market have left little liquidity at the far end of the curve, and an influx of speculative money at the near end is making market movements difficult to forecast. Many of the changes may reverse when the price curve changes, but the banks will not return any time soon – their regulators have made their feelings clear on the issue. This, more than any other factor, means the oil hedging business has changed significantly and permanently.
More on Risk management
Energy Risk 2026 Software Rankings: CTRM landscape needs to support resilience
Commodity firms’ software choices across the CTRM landscape are crucial amid current uncertainty
EU can handle energy price pressure – it’s been here before
Reforms made after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine have made region more resilient to energy shocks, officials say
A Hormuz tipping point may be days away
Agent-based model suggests delays and shortages likely to accelerate after four weeks
ENGIE’s Daronnat: pricing flexibility in the German battery market
Head of flexibility and structured origination in Germany discusses the role of FPAs and what risk teams must consider
Next-gen PPA contracts reshaping European power markets
As energy market participants seek new ways of capturing value from volatility, new skills are required to structure and price increasingly complex power purchase agreements
Energy Risk reaction: Impact of Middle East conflict on hedging and longer term risk
Energy Risk talks to Riccardo Rossi at Centrica Energy and Rob McLeod at Hartree Partners about the impact of the Iran crisis so far on firms exposed to energy
Iran strikes a stress test for CCP margin models
CME’s Span2 and Ice’s IRM2 are performing as advertised. The next few days could test their mettle
Energy Risk Debates: the role of the risk manager
Panellists discuss the different roles of the risk manager, how much standardisation there is across firms and whether the role is ever clear