Revived Dodd-Frank position limits worry energy firms
Of all the regulatory initiatives undertaken by the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) as a result of the Dodd-Frank Act, none have yielded such an angry response from the energy industry as the effort to impose speculative position limits on commodity derivatives.
When the commission first tried to implement position limits in 2011, critics blasted them as flawed and unnecessary, raising doubts about the rule's rationale – the idea that excessive speculation was causing runaway
More on Regulation
Esma sounds out industry for ways to cut reporting burden
Markets watchdog asks consultative groups for ideas to simplify reporting rules
Why EU banks have snubbed revised green finance metric
Banks steer clear of Banking Book Taxonomy Alignment Ratio in droves
Ruled out: can regulators settle the pre-hedging debate?
Market participants are at odds over the practice and whether regulation or principles can settle the score
First green asset ratios come in low as EU banks protest methodology
ABN Amro only bank to break double digits in a sample of 23 lenders
Commodities surge presents UMR test for Asia’s sell side
Increased interest in commodity exotics comes amid scrutiny of margin calculation models
Some see Esma reining in position limits after review
The scope of position limits could shrink to cover just the major benchmarks, one executive argues
Burden of implementing US sanctions now firmly on energy firms
Energy firms must now screen operations of every vessel they deal with, writes maritime data expert
Shipping and energy firms revisit hedging on IMO 2020
Upcoming shipping rules set to impact fuel prices across the energy complex
