EU capital rules for energy traders not as bad as feared – PwC
Commodity firms can slash Mifid II capital charges by 40%, report finds
The impact of the European Union's reworked Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (Mifid II) on energy firms will not be as cataclysmic as market participants now think, a new report from New York-based consultancy PwC suggests.
EU energy companies have been up in arms over Mifid II, which could hit them with bank-like capital charges for trading derivatives. The charges could run into billions of dollars for larger firms and force many participants out of commodity derivatives markets
More on Regulation
Esma sounds out industry for ways to cut reporting burden
Markets watchdog asks consultative groups for ideas to simplify reporting rules
Why EU banks have snubbed revised green finance metric
Banks steer clear of Banking Book Taxonomy Alignment Ratio in droves
Ruled out: can regulators settle the pre-hedging debate?
Market participants are at odds over the practice and whether regulation or principles can settle the score
First green asset ratios come in low as EU banks protest methodology
ABN Amro only bank to break double digits in a sample of 23 lenders
Commodities surge presents UMR test for Asia’s sell side
Increased interest in commodity exotics comes amid scrutiny of margin calculation models
Some see Esma reining in position limits after review
The scope of position limits could shrink to cover just the major benchmarks, one executive argues
Burden of implementing US sanctions now firmly on energy firms
Energy firms must now screen operations of every vessel they deal with, writes maritime data expert
Shipping and energy firms revisit hedging on IMO 2020
Upcoming shipping rules set to impact fuel prices across the energy complex
