Energy Risk 2026 Software Rankings: CTRM landscape needs to support resilience
Commodity firms’ software choices across the CTRM landscape are crucial amid current uncertainty
Click here to view the full tables
As markets continue to assess the impact of the Middle East conflict, it is critical that commodity firms are able to view their positions, understand rapidly changing exposures and take timely action where required.
Higher oil and gas prices have already led to rising margin calls at the major commodity exchanges and clearing houses. According to Risk.net, margin rises at the start of the conflict were consistent with energy supplies normalising in about four to six weeks. As the conflict extends beyond that, significant margin hikes could be on the cards. Firms with open interest in those markets will therefore need to be able to calculate the impact of this on cashflows and make any necessary adjustments.
If the Strait of Hormuz remains unnavigable for a prolonged period, then the conflict moves to a different stage where trade routes would need to be renegotiated, supply shortages could arise and prices could skyrocket, analysts say. Inflationary pressures would then hit world economies with full force and commodity firms would need to manage emergency operational issues, increased credit risk and rising supply chain risk as well as high prices.
The ease with which firms can view their positions across the company, understand exposures and the linkages between exposures, calculate market and credit risk and forecast margin calls, will depend on the commodity trading and risk management (CTRM) software landscape they have in place. The functionalities offered by the software, its ability to integrate with other applications and the quality of data going into it will have a huge impact on how well firms weather the months ahead.
Energy Risk’s annual Software Rankings survey shows which CTRM and enterprise risk management (ERM) software systems were considered the most proficient in a variety of areas during 2025 and into 2026. In the survey – now in its 21st year – participants voted for their preferred CTRM and ERM software providers in different commodity product categories and functionalities. Firms also voted for their preferred data firms.
In a survey that ran alongside the Rankings poll, respondents said one of their biggest IT challenges is understanding what new technologies are out there. This is where technology advisers can provide invaluable help, and these are also included in the survey.
Click on the link above to see the Software Rankings results for 2026.
How the poll was conducted
The survey went live on November 24, 2025 and closed on January 30, 2026. It received 624 valid responses. To compile the Software Rankings, respondents were asked to vote for their preferred software vendor, data management firm, data provider and technology adviser in a variety of categories. All votes were carefully checked and invalid votes stripped out. Examples of votes considered invalid are people voting for their own firm or using a free internet-based email address, multiple votes from the same person or IP address, and voters who choose the same firm indiscriminately throughout the survey.
Following closure of the poll, the results are subject to an internal review process, which can result in categories being dropped if they do not have enough votes. The outcome of the review is final.
More on Risk management
EU can handle energy price pressure – it’s been here before
Reforms made after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine have made region more resilient to energy shocks, officials say
A Hormuz tipping point may be days away
Agent-based model suggests delays and shortages likely to accelerate after four weeks
ENGIE’s Daronnat: pricing flexibility in the German battery market
Head of flexibility and structured origination in Germany discusses the role of FPAs and what risk teams must consider
Next-gen PPA contracts reshaping European power markets
As energy market participants seek new ways of capturing value from volatility, new skills are required to structure and price increasingly complex power purchase agreements
Energy Risk reaction: Impact of Middle East conflict on hedging and longer term risk
Energy Risk talks to Riccardo Rossi at Centrica Energy and Rob McLeod at Hartree Partners about the impact of the Iran crisis so far on firms exposed to energy
Iran strikes a stress test for CCP margin models
CME’s Span2 and Ice’s IRM2 are performing as advertised. The next few days could test their mettle
Energy Risk Debates: the role of the risk manager
Panellists discuss the different roles of the risk manager, how much standardisation there is across firms and whether the role is ever clear
Interest in battery and flexibility soars in European energy markets
Energy traders are structuring bespoke contracts around Bess and flexibility that facilitate new ways of managing and sharing risk in this nascent market