Seeking a systemic role
Sponsored Q&A: Banca IMI
This article was paid for by a contributing third party.
By overhauling old practices and creating a dynamic new culture, Banca IMI hopes to place itself at the centre of the energy trading system. Stefano Rivellini, global head of commodity sales (pictured), explains how, by investing heavily in the physical energy complex, the bank is offering clients balance-sheet transparency, increased liquidity and ready access to markets.
Energy Risk: Could you give some background on Banca IMI? Which markets and underlyings do you operate in?
Stefano Rivellini: Banca IMI is the investment bank of the Intesa Sanpaolo Group. It has been active in the commodities sector since 2005, with increasing volumes and market share. The bank has always traded in derivatives, but the big boost in volumes came after we started the physical gas trading initiative in July 2015.
Energy Risk: Why is Banca IMI ramping up its presence in commodities when most banks are scaling back?
Stefano Rivellini: The answer is closely linked to the role Intesa Sanpaolo and Banca IMI have in the Italian and international markets, that of enabling corporates to access these markets and build their industrial business. That is why we entered the physical gas market. It was not a trading or a speculative decision, it was a way of satisfying client requests.
The gas market has a large cash imbalance because clients need to buy gas before selling to final clients. It’s a really credit-intensive market, where liquidity access can be very difficult.
Energy Risk: What is Banca IMI doing differently to other banks?
Stefano Rivellini: One of the main reasons a lot of financial players left the market was the regulatory framework disallowing the ownership of physical assets.
Our approach has always been completely different. We are entering the market to complete our offering and to protect our lending to the corporate. We don’t have clients for whom we are investing in terms of credit lines for derivatives – that is, physical products without the lending. For us, being in the physical market is a way of enhancing our clients’ capability to pay back their debt. It is a commercial decision, not a trading one.
Energy Risk: To what do you attribute your success in this year’s Energy Risk Commodity Rankings?
Stefano Rivellini: We have a very young and passionate team with dedicated structuring, trading, accountancy and legal support. I always say that our mantra is “client first”, and this mantra is probably the reason for our success.
Energy Risk: What do you see as the key trends in the market now and what is your focus as a result?
Stefano Rivellini: The macroeconomic environment is extremely complex. With depressed demand and volatile underlyings, clients are always trying to reduce their costs of funding and maintain their liquidity access. That’s why we have three main areas of focus. The first is counterparty risk reduction, the second is the big trend in working capital reduction, and the third is what we call cashflow optimisation dynamics.
We think these are the main methods to improve risk management for corporates. We offer a solution to increase balance-sheet transparency in a market where systemic risk can be extremely harmful.
Energy Risk: What other initiatives does the bank have in commodities?
Stefano Rivellini: The bank as a whole is investing in the energy sector, not only with the capital markets physical gas project, but our project finance team also closed an important deal last year with a corporate called Ital Gas Storage. This can be considered a result of a new cultural approach within the bank and an extremely strong awareness of market dynamics.
Energy Risk: What do you see as the main challenges lying ahead for the industry?
Stefano Rivellini: For the energy complex, credit will continue to be a major challenge that we hope we are well placed to help our clients address.
Energy Risk: What are the next steps for you?
Stefano Rivellini: Given the big success we have had on the physical gas side, we are thinking of expanding our offering of physical products. So, first of all, after our trading in gas for the Italian and Dutch markets, we will probably move on to other products and to other markets. At the same time we will move to other physical underlyings such as power or emissions, but it really depends on client requests because “client first” will remain our mantra.
More on Risk management
Energy Risk 2026 Software Rankings: CTRM landscape needs to support resilience
Commodity firms’ software choices across the CTRM landscape are crucial amid current uncertainty
EU can handle energy price pressure – it’s been here before
Reforms made after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine have made region more resilient to energy shocks, officials say
A Hormuz tipping point may be days away
Agent-based model suggests delays and shortages likely to accelerate after four weeks
ENGIE’s Daronnat: pricing flexibility in the German battery market
Head of flexibility and structured origination in Germany discusses the role of FPAs and what risk teams must consider
Next-gen PPA contracts reshaping European power markets
As energy market participants seek new ways of capturing value from volatility, new skills are required to structure and price increasingly complex power purchase agreements
Energy Risk reaction: Impact of Middle East conflict on hedging and longer term risk
Energy Risk talks to Riccardo Rossi at Centrica Energy and Rob McLeod at Hartree Partners about the impact of the Iran crisis so far on firms exposed to energy
Iran strikes a stress test for CCP margin models
CME’s Span2 and Ice’s IRM2 are performing as advertised. The next few days could test their mettle
Energy Risk Debates: the role of the risk manager
Panellists discuss the different roles of the risk manager, how much standardisation there is across firms and whether the role is ever clear
