
Energy Risk Software Rankings: A different world
Energy Risk’s Software Rankings reveal the industry’s technology preferences in a changing world
Click here to view the full tables
As Covid-19 causes social distancing and remote working around the globe, never has technology been more vital to the functioning of society, financial markets and the economy. Energy risk managers and traders the world over are having to allocate risk capital – during the most intense and volatile markets ever seen – from the isolation of their homes.
Commodity trading and software (CTRM) systems now need to supply real time information to a widely dispersed user base while carrying out the ever more complex calculations and dynamic modelling required in today’s turbulent markets.
Firms that have begun the journey to the cloud are likely to have advantages in this new environment. In a recent Energy Risk survey on the use of commodities technology by energy firms (which was sent out at the same time as the Software Rankings and will be published in full next month), almost one-third of respondents said their CTRM system is fully in the cloud, with a further 15% reporting that some functionalities are in the cloud.
CTRM systems now need to supply a single record of truth in real time to a widely dispersed user base while carrying out the ever more complex calculations and dynamic modelling required in today’s turbulent markets
While this signifies that over half of energy trading companies still have no cloud-based CTRM applications, it represents a substantial swing towards the cloud from last year.
In the 2019 survey, some 67% of respondents reported having no cloud-based CTRM applications at all, with only a quarter saying their CTRM system was fully in the cloud.
This year’s Energy Risk software survey was expanded for the second year running to reflect some of the new technological offerings now available to energy and commodity trading firms beyond the core CTRM space. It contains an entirely new section on logistics, shipping, land and rail transport, as well as some new sub-categories throughout. The CTRM section has been divided into ‘derivatives software’, ‘physical trading and operations software’ and ‘front- and middle-office functionality’ to better reflect real-world operations.
Once again, the CTRM section reflects the dominance of the large, traditional vendors such as Ion Commodities: Allegro, Ion Commodities: Openlink and Pioneer Solutions, as well as specialists like Lacima Analytics. The new transport section showed Veson Nautical and SmartFreight gaining first positions, while the enterprise risk section shows the popularity of firms such as CubeLogic, Pioneer and Lacima Analytics in that field.
In the data providers section, winners were Genscape, Kpler, Bloomberg and S&P Global Platts. ZE PowerGroup once again dominated the data management section, while there were wins for KWA Analytics, Lacima Analytics, Machina Automation and Publicis Sapient in the technology advisory category.
Methodology
The survey went live on January 14, 2020 and closed on February 14. It received 247 valid responses. To compile the Software Rankings, respondents were asked to vote for their preferred software vendor, data management firm, data provider and technology adviser in a variety of categories.
All votes were carefully checked and invalid votes stripped out. Examples of votes considered invalid are people voting for their own firm or using a free internet-based email address, multiple votes from the same person or IP address, and voters who choose the same firm indiscriminately throughout the survey.
Following closure of the poll, the results are subject to an internal review process, which can result in categories being dropped if they do not have enough votes. The outcome of the review is final.
More on Risk management
Energy Risk at 30: Learning from the past
Energy Risk looks back at the seminal events and developments that have shaped today’s energy markets
The 10 biggest energy risk management disasters of the past 20 years
The history of energy trading is littered with losses, bankruptcies and other misfortunes that now serve as cautionary tales. Alexander Osipovich looks back at the biggest energy risk management disasters of the past two decades and how they reshaped the industry
Past disasters can prove the value of energy risk management
Analysing failures and losses at energy firms can underscore the value of consistent, high-quality risk management
How quants shaped the modern energy markets
The business models of today’s utility firms are built on quantitative analysis, but the introduction of these techniques in the 1990s was far from smooth
Interview: Vince Kaminski
Market veteran Vince Kaminski discusses the biggest risks to energy firms today and whether risk teams can ever prove their value
Mounting risk prompts refocus on integrated energy risk management
Energy firms are facing heightened risk due to shifting geopolitics, climate change and the energy transition. As market, credit and enterprise risks ramp up, the need for improved integrated risk management is growing, say risk managers
Energy supply chains seen as a growing risk
Supply chain risk is now a major concern, with some firms even viewing it as an existential threat, survey finds
Can behavioural science curb rogue traders… and compliance costs?
Instead of using surveillance to catch endless bad apples, experts urge banks to clean the barrel