Energy Risk Software Rankings: dealing with volatility
Volatility triggers greater need for commodity trading and risk management software
Click here to view the software tables
Whipsawing commodities prices during 2021, especially in the last quarter, meant that it was vital for commodities firms to be able to monitor their positions very close to real time, to have visibility into their risk exposures and to have the tools to manage and mitigate those risks.
These imperatives increased the need for firms to have robust commodities trading and risk management (CTRM) software systems at the heart of their operations. As well as the need to improve position management, market and credit risk, demand grew for tools to manage physical risk, scheduling and logistics. The appetite for analytics development also grew at many firms.
Energy Risk’s annual Software Rankings survey shows which CTRM and enterprise risk software systems were considered the most proficient across a variety of different areas in the commodities landscape during 2021 and into 2022. In the survey – now in its 17th year – participants vote for their preferred software vendors and applications, data providers, data management firms and implementation specialists. The poll covers CTRM and enterprise risk systems, trading platforms, data firms and implementation specialists.
While price volatility has made operating in commodities markets challenging recently, the reopening of economies after lockdowns and the resulting commodity boom has fuelled growth in many small to mid-sized commodities firms. This in turn has created the need for more sophisticated trading and risk management functionality. According to a software survey which ran alongside the Software Rankings poll, many firms want to see more processes in their CTRM systems being automated.
In the survey, which polled software users and implementation specialists about the use of commodities software, 70% of respondents said their organisation planned to increase automation within their CTRM systems this year. When asked what their organisation is ultimately trying to achieve through making changes to the CTRM software landscape, 75% of respondents said it wanted to increase operational efficiencies. The major factor driving firms to make changes – voted for by 51% of respondents – was given as growth of the company, with increased market complexity being the second most popular reason.
In the 2022 Software Rankings, the CTRM section is once again dominated by Ion Commodities and Hitachi Energy and the enterprise risk section by Lacima. Veson Nautical tops the shipping category, with SmartFreight coming first for land transportation. Meanwhile, KWA Analytics and Lacima feature throughout the technology advisory section.
Methodology
The survey went live on December 14, 2021 and closed on February 14, 2022. It received 584 valid responses. To compile the Software Rankings, respondents were asked to vote for their preferred software vendor, data management firm, data provider and technology adviser in a variety of categories. All votes were carefully checked and invalid votes stripped out. Examples of votes considered invalid are people voting for their own firm or using a free internet-based email address, multiple votes from the same person or IP address, and voters who choose the same firm indiscriminately throughout the survey.
Following closure of the poll, the results are subject to an internal review process, which can result in categories being dropped if they do not have enough votes. The outcome of the review is final.
More on Risk management
Energy Risk 2026 Software Rankings: CTRM landscape needs to support resilience
Commodity firms’ software choices across the CTRM landscape are crucial amid current uncertainty
EU can handle energy price pressure – it’s been here before
Reforms made after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine have made region more resilient to energy shocks, officials say
A Hormuz tipping point may be days away
Agent-based model suggests delays and shortages likely to accelerate after four weeks
ENGIE’s Daronnat: pricing flexibility in the German battery market
Head of flexibility and structured origination in Germany discusses the role of FPAs and what risk teams must consider
Next-gen PPA contracts reshaping European power markets
As energy market participants seek new ways of capturing value from volatility, new skills are required to structure and price increasingly complex power purchase agreements
Energy Risk reaction: Impact of Middle East conflict on hedging and longer term risk
Energy Risk talks to Riccardo Rossi at Centrica Energy and Rob McLeod at Hartree Partners about the impact of the Iran crisis so far on firms exposed to energy
Iran strikes a stress test for CCP margin models
CME’s Span2 and Ice’s IRM2 are performing as advertised. The next few days could test their mettle
Energy Risk Debates: the role of the risk manager
Panellists discuss the different roles of the risk manager, how much standardisation there is across firms and whether the role is ever clear