Energy Risk Commodity Rankings 2023: adapting to new market dynamics
Winners of the 2023 Commodity Rankings provided reliability when clients faced extreme change
Click here to view tables
Commodity market participants experienced head-spinning change over the past year. Decades-old trade routes were upended and supply chains weakened following Russia’s February 2022 invasion of Ukraine, while Covid-19 lockdowns in China continued to disrupt supply and demand norms.
As oil and gas prices spiralled, markets, particularly in Europe, became subject to higher levels of government and regulatory scrutiny and input. Various schemes to cap retail prices have added to longer term uncertainty in the wholesale markets.
High inflation and rising interest rates also added further risk and increased the focus once again on counterparty credit risk.
The winners of this year’s Commodity Rankings have demonstrated enormous resilience in the face of such uncertainty, remaining reliable and effective in extreme conditions. Not only has carrying out risk management been more essential than ever over the past year, it has also become more difficult. Many tried and tested models have had to be overhauled or abandoned amid such change. Hedging has become more expensive and riskier with ongoing price volatility, resulting in some eye-watering margin calls.
Faced with this level of challenge, many energy producers and consumers turned to banks, large energy firms, brokers and research providers to help steer, execute and shore up their risk-management strategies. The 2023 Commodity Rankings tables show the firms deemed by their clients to have provided the best services during this extremely challenging time.
To see the Commodity Rankings tables in full, please click on the link above.
How the poll was conducted
The Energy Risk Commodity Rankings survey was live between November 2, 2022 and January 5, 2023 and received valid responses from 708 individuals. The survey asked respondents to vote for their top three dealers and brokers in any markets in which they had been active over the previous year. The rankings poll is designed to reflect market participants’ perception of a dealer or broker based on the overall quality of service they offer their clients. It is not intended to reflect volumes traded in any market. Instead, respondents vote according to a range of criteria including reliability, pricing, liquidity provision and speed of execution.
To create the final list of rankings, Energy Risk aggregates the results, weighting them by awarding three points for a first place, two points for second place and one point for third. The points are then added up and the highest-placed firms in each category are listed in the Rankings tables. The Overall Rankings (Best overall dealer and Best overall broker etc) are calculated by adding up all the points accrued to each firm across the different sections (Oil, Gas, Power etc). Following closure of the poll, the results are subject to an internal review process, which can result in categories being dropped or aggregated if they do not have enough votes. The outcome of the review is final.
More on Risk management
Energy Risk 2026 Software Rankings: CTRM landscape needs to support resilience
Commodity firms’ software choices across the CTRM landscape are crucial amid current uncertainty
EU can handle energy price pressure – it’s been here before
Reforms made after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine have made region more resilient to energy shocks, officials say
A Hormuz tipping point may be days away
Agent-based model suggests delays and shortages likely to accelerate after four weeks
ENGIE’s Daronnat: pricing flexibility in the German battery market
Head of flexibility and structured origination in Germany discusses the role of FPAs and what risk teams must consider
Next-gen PPA contracts reshaping European power markets
As energy market participants seek new ways of capturing value from volatility, new skills are required to structure and price increasingly complex power purchase agreements
Energy Risk reaction: Impact of Middle East conflict on hedging and longer term risk
Energy Risk talks to Riccardo Rossi at Centrica Energy and Rob McLeod at Hartree Partners about the impact of the Iran crisis so far on firms exposed to energy
Iran strikes a stress test for CCP margin models
CME’s Span2 and Ice’s IRM2 are performing as advertised. The next few days could test their mettle
Energy Risk Debates: the role of the risk manager
Panellists discuss the different roles of the risk manager, how much standardisation there is across firms and whether the role is ever clear
