Newcomer of the year: Topaz Technology


It was 2015 when Jon Fox and a few former colleagues decided to form Topaz Technology. In their previous roles, they had seen many different systems and, in some cases, written and built a few themselves
But there was always something missing. That led Fox, now the chief executive officer of Topaz, and his colleagues to invest time and energy into building a system that unifies risk reporting and risk analytics tools for the commodities market.

Today, Topaz offers real-time cross-commodity pricing and risk management solutions for traders and risk teams. Its clients range from derivatives market makers to energy super-majors and commodities trading houses.
“We spent a bit of time in the beginning creating solid roots for the system, and implementing for every commodity market independently, to have functionality that could support the various nuances of those markets. We did this earlier in the process so we had a system that was going to stand the test of time,” he says.
That investment is starting to pay dividends. Most recently, Topaz signed a major deal with a large Singapore-based energy trader looking for intraday, faster, more accurate and robust portfolio valuations.
Then, earlier this year, global commodity trading firm ERA Commodities went live with Topaz’s risk management and analytics solution across their desks in London and Singapore.
Topaz also secured another deal with IXM SA, one of the largest traders of physical non-ferrous metals worldwide, which opted to use Topaz’s real-time risk analytics platform and order management system.
Use cases
Fox says Topaz has two main use cases. The first is augmenting firms’ existing trading and risk systems without ripping out the legacy system. In this case, Topaz’s technology will sit on top of the existing system and provide clients with all valuations, risks and analytics.
“Obviously augmentation implies an element of integration, but this is a much lower risk activity than doing a wholesale replacement of one particular commodity trading risk management [CTRM] platform with another. That CTRM platform typically winds up being integrated with multiple other systems and so, effectively, is an integration hub. If you’re tearing out that integration hub to put another in, that is a super risky thing,” he says.
Another use case is providing derivatives trading companies with similarly sophisticated functionality as the main system of record, with straight-through-processing (STP) of trades from ICE and CME, for example, into Topaz, alongside easy capture of over-the-counter trades.
Fox says that, in one example, a Singapore-based firm approached Topaz because it wanted more flexibility. “They wanted to do things like real-time profit-and-loss (P&L) decompositions so they could attribute P&L and destructure things such as oil trades, which is not something they could get with a basic [STP] system,” he says.
Growing interest within the region also led to Topaz opening its Singapore office in May 2024. Fox says one of its team members in the UK will move to Singapore to build up the team and manage growth in the region.
Topaz is currently looking at enhancing its physical capability. Fox says the firm has a physical model that works for cargoes, for example, and handles pricing concerns around existing cargo functionality. It is also working on a “mini programming language” to handle complex energy pricing.
“We also have a sophisticated physical pricing module, including internal escalation terms and any other pricing-related concerns,” he says. “We’re continuing to work on that and intend to release an updated version of that model next year.”
More on Risk management
Energy Risk at 30: Learning from the past
Energy Risk looks back at the seminal events and developments that have shaped today’s energy markets
The 10 biggest energy risk management disasters of the past 20 years
The history of energy trading is littered with losses, bankruptcies and other misfortunes that now serve as cautionary tales. Alexander Osipovich looks back at the biggest energy risk management disasters of the past two decades and how they reshaped the industry
Past disasters can prove the value of energy risk management
Analysing failures and losses at energy firms showcases the value of consistent, high-quality risk management
How quants shaped the modern energy markets
The business models of today’s utility firms are built on quantitative analysis, but the introduction of these techniques in the 1990s was far from smooth
Insights from Vince Kaminski
Market veteran Vince Kaminski discusses the biggest risks to energy firms today and whether risk teams can ever prove their value
Mounting risk prompts refocus on integrated energy risk management
Energy firms are facing heightened risk due to shifting geopolitics, climate change and the energy transition. As market, credit and enterprise risks ramp up, the need for improved integrated risk management is growing, say risk managers
Energy supply chains seen as a growing risk
Supply chain risk is now a major concern, with some firms even viewing it as an existential threat, survey finds
Can behavioural science curb rogue traders… and compliance costs?
Instead of using surveillance to catch endless bad apples, experts urge banks to clean the barrel