Energy Risk Software Rankings 2023: managing uncertainty
Unpredictable markets make CTRM software choices key
Click here to view the full tables
Change and uncertainty are nothing new for commodity risk managers and traders, but the scale of change over the past year has challenged even the most seasoned market participants, making their technology choices more significant than ever.
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February last year changed geopolitical norms and upended well-established market structures, such as trade routes, supply chains and even price formation. As governments and regulators around the world stepped in to cap retail energy prices, further complexity was added to modelling risk.
Additionally, traditional market models are struggling in today’s macroeconomic environment of soaring inflation, rising interest rates and increased risk. Hedging has become more expensive and market volatility has led to some huge spikes in margin calls.
To have the best prospects amid such uncertainty, it’s more important than ever for market participants to have clear visibility and a proper understanding of their positions and risk exposures. They also need the tools to manage and mitigate their exposures.
Having a robust commodities trading and risk management (CTRM) software system is essential in today’s volatile market for dealing with position management, market and credit risk, as is having cutting-edge tools to manage physical risk, scheduling and logistics.
Energy Risk’s annual Software Rankings survey shows which CTRM and enterprise risk software systems were considered the most proficient across a variety of different areas in the commodities landscape during 2022. In the survey – now in its 18th year – participants vote for their preferred software vendors and applications, data providers, data management firms and implementation specialists. The poll covers CTRM and enterprise risk systems, trading platforms, data firms and implementation specialists.
Click on the link above to see the Software Rankings results for 2023.
Methodology
The survey went live on October 19, 2022 and closed on November 21, 2022. It received 220 valid responses. To compile the Software Rankings, respondents were asked to vote for their preferred software vendor, data management firm, data provider and technology adviser, in a variety of categories. All votes were carefully checked, and invalid votes stripped out. Examples of votes considered invalid are people voting for their own firm or using a free, internet-based email address, multiple votes from the same person or IP address, and voters who choose the same firm indiscriminately throughout the survey.
Following closure of the poll, the results are subject to an internal review process, which can result in categories being dropped if they do not have enough votes. The outcome of the review is final.
More on Risk management
Energy Risk 2026 Software Rankings: CTRM landscape needs to support resilience
Commodity firms’ software choices across the CTRM landscape are crucial amid current uncertainty
EU can handle energy price pressure – it’s been here before
Reforms made after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine have made region more resilient to energy shocks, officials say
A Hormuz tipping point may be days away
Agent-based model suggests delays and shortages likely to accelerate after four weeks
ENGIE’s Daronnat: pricing flexibility in the German battery market
Head of flexibility and structured origination in Germany discusses the role of FPAs and what risk teams must consider
Next-gen PPA contracts reshaping European power markets
As energy market participants seek new ways of capturing value from volatility, new skills are required to structure and price increasingly complex power purchase agreements
Energy Risk reaction: Impact of Middle East conflict on hedging and longer term risk
Energy Risk talks to Riccardo Rossi at Centrica Energy and Rob McLeod at Hartree Partners about the impact of the Iran crisis so far on firms exposed to energy
Iran strikes a stress test for CCP margin models
CME’s Span2 and Ice’s IRM2 are performing as advertised. The next few days could test their mettle
Energy Risk Debates: the role of the risk manager
Panellists discuss the different roles of the risk manager, how much standardisation there is across firms and whether the role is ever clear